Si, es el colofón que cabía esperar tras este "timeline" desde 2012 escrito hace pocos meses, que suscribo en líneas generales (yo siempre he sido mucho más escéptico y más pronto, la verdad, pero me vale):
https://www.moneyness.ca/2024/12/after-twelve-years-of-writing-about.html
"I didn't nail this down till
a 2018 post entitled
A Case for Bitcoin. We all thought at the outset that bitcoin was a monetary thingamajig. But we were wrong. Of the types of assets already in existence, bitcoin was
not akin to gold, cash, or bank deposits. Rather, it was most similar to an age-old category of financial games and zero-sum bets that includes poker, lotteries, and roulette. The particular sub-branch of the financial game family that bitcoin belonged to was
early-bird games, which contains pyramids, ponzis, and chain letters."